2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* @file testSimulated2D.cpp
|
|
|
|
* @brief Unit tests for simulated 2D measurement functions
|
|
|
|
* @author Christian Potthast
|
|
|
|
* @author Carlos Nieto
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
#include <CppUnitLite/TestHarness.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "numericalDerivative.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "simulated2D.h"
|
2010-02-23 13:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "Simulated2DConfig.h"
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace gtsam;
|
|
|
|
using namespace std;
|
Large gtsam refactoring
To support faster development *and* better performance Richard and I pushed through a large refactoring of NonlinearFactors.
The following are the biggest changes:
1) NonLinearFactor1 and NonLinearFactor2 are now templated on Config, Key type, and X type, where X is the argument to the measurement function.
2) The measurement itself is no longer kept in the nonlinear factor. Instead, a derived class (see testVSLAMFactor, testNonlinearEquality, testPose3Factor etc...) has to implement a function to compute the errors, "evaluateErrors". Instead of (h(x)-z), it needs to return (z-h(x)), so Ax-b is an approximation of the error. IMPORTANT: evaluateErrors needs - if asked - *combine* the calculation of the function value h(x) and the derivatives dh(x)/dx. This was a major performance issue. To do this, boost::optional<Matrix&> arguments are provided, and tin EvaluateErrors you just says something like
if (H) *H = Matrix_(3,6,....);
3) We are no longer using int or strings for nonlinear factors. Instead, the preferred key type is now Symbol, defined in Key.h. This is both fast and cool: you can construct it from an int, and cast it to a strong. It also does type checking: a Symbol<Pose3,'x'> will not match a Symbol<Pose2,'x'>
4) minor: take a look at LieConfig.h: it help you avoid writing a lot of code bu automatically creating configs for a certain type. See e.g. Pose3Config.h. A "double" LieConfig is on the way - Thanks Richard and Manohar !
2010-01-14 06:25:03 +08:00
|
|
|
using namespace simulated2D;
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-23 13:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/* ************************************************************************* */
|
|
|
|
TEST( simulated2D, Simulated2DConfig )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Simulated2DConfig actual;
|
|
|
|
actual.insertPose(1,Point2(1,1));
|
|
|
|
actual.insertPoint(2,Point2(2,2));
|
|
|
|
CHECK(assert_equal(actual,actual,1e-9));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
/* ************************************************************************* */
|
|
|
|
TEST( simulated2D, Dprior )
|
|
|
|
{
|
2010-01-19 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
Point2 x(1,-9);
|
2010-01-11 02:23:47 +08:00
|
|
|
Matrix numerical = numericalDerivative11(prior,x);
|
2010-01-14 10:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
Matrix computed;
|
|
|
|
prior(x,computed);
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
CHECK(assert_equal(numerical,computed,1e-9));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ************************************************************************* */
|
2010-01-14 10:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST( simulated2D, DOdo )
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2010-01-19 13:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
Point2 x1(1,-9),x2(-5,6);
|
2010-01-14 10:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
Matrix H1,H2;
|
|
|
|
odo(x1,x2,H1,H2);
|
|
|
|
Matrix A1 = numericalDerivative21(odo,x1,x2);
|
|
|
|
CHECK(assert_equal(A1,H1,1e-9));
|
|
|
|
Matrix A2 = numericalDerivative22(odo,x1,x2);
|
|
|
|
CHECK(assert_equal(A2,H2,1e-9));
|
2009-08-22 06:23:24 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ************************************************************************* */
|
|
|
|
int main() { TestResult tr; return TestRegistry::runAllTests(tr);}
|
|
|
|
/* ************************************************************************* */
|